§ Dataflow analysis using Grobner basis

This was a quick experiment in using Grobner basis to model situations. We can represent our dataflow analysis constraints in terms of polynomial rewrites over F2F_2. Given the program:
p = { 0: ["=", "x", 'y'],
      1: ['br', 2, 100],
      2: ['=', 'z', 'x'],
      3: ['br', 2],
      100: ['ret', 'z'] }
whose semantics I hope are fairly straightforward --- the dictionary represents instruction locations. Instructions proceed sequentially. branch moves control flow around. Note that br can branch to multiple locations, since we are not control-flow sensitive. The idea is that since in a dataflow analysis, we need information at each variable at each program point, we can create a ring of polynomials over F2F_2 for each variable at each program point. So in this case, we wold need:
R = F_2[x0, y0, z0, x1, y1, z1, x2, y2, z2, x3, y3, z3, x100, y100, z100]
We then add elements into the ideal that represents our constraints. For example, to perform dataflow analysis, we need to add constraints about how if a variable z is alive, all variables that are used to compute z at 100 are alive. This sets up equations that may have cycles (in the case of loops). These are usually resolved using the Kildall algorithm . However, we can also ask SAGE to kindly solve the Grobner basis. I hypothesize that the "easy" dataflow problems out to be toric ideals which admit much faster solutions.