If we have a set S, we can form a category of bundles over S. These are pairs
(X,π:X→S). The morphisms between such objects (X,π:X→S)and (X′,π′:X′→S) are arrows h:X→X′ that
make the obvious diagram commute:
X ---h--> X'
\ /
pi pi'
\ /
v v
S
The product of these objects is given by the fiber product or pullback:
X×SY≡{(x,y)∈X×Y:πX(x)=πY(y)}
along with the map πX×Y:X×Y→S;π((x,y))≡πX(x).
See that for consistenty, we could also have defined this as π((x,y))≡πY(y).
Since our condition is that πX(x)=πY(y), it all works out.
Said differently, we consider the product of fibers over the same base-point.
§ Fiber products of arbitrary bundle over a single-point base space
If S≡{∗}, then the projections are always π(−)≡∗, and the fiber
product is the usual product.
§ Fiber products of singleton bundle over arbitrary base space
If S is arbitrary while P≡{p} (for Point),
then this bundle P will lie over some point in S, given
by π:P→S, where the special point
is chosen by π(p)=sp. If we now consider some other bundle X over S,
Then P×SX will pick the element (p∈P,πX−1(sp)⊆X).
That is P×SX≃πX−1(s∗), which is the fibre of X over
the special point sp=π(p). This explains the name.
Consider a fiber bundle EπB. Now consider a new base space B′with a map f:B′→B. So we have the data:
E
pi|
v
B'-f-> B
Given this, we would like to pullback the bundle E along f to get a new
bundle over B′.This is defined by:
Ef′≡{(b′,e):f(b′)=π(e)}⊆B′×E
This is equipped with the subspace topology. We have the projection map
pi′:Ef′→B, π′((b′,e))≡b′. The projection into
the second factor gives a map h:Ef′→E, h((b′,e))≡e.
This makes the obvious diagram commute:
E' -h-> E
|pi' |pi
B' -f-> B
Any section σ:B→E of E induces a section of E′σ′:B′→E′, by producing the function (given as a relation):
σ′:B′→E′σ(b′)≡(b′,σ(f(b′))∈?E′≃B′×E
This has codomain E′. To check, if (b′,σ(f(b′)) is in E′,
we need f(b′)=π(σ(f(b′)). But this is true since σis a section, and thus π(σ(f(b′))=f(b′).
Moreover, we need to check that σ′ is indeed a section of B′. For this,
we need to check that π′(σ′(b′))=b′. Chasing definitions, we find
that this is:
π′(σ′(b′))=π′(b′,σ(f(b′)))=b′
Hence we are done, we have indeed produced a legitimate section.
Let R,A,B be rings. consider A⊗RB. What is Spec(A⊗RB), in terms of
Spec(A), Spec(B), and whatever data you like about R? (Say I give you both R and Spec(R)).
The answer is that apparently, it's exactly Spec(A)×Spec(R)Spec(B).