§ Separable extension via embeddings into alg. closure
§ Defn by embeddings
- Let L/K be a finite extension.
- It is separable iff a given embedding σ:K→K can be extended in [L:K] ways (This number can be at most [L:K].)
- We call the numbe of ways to embed L in K via extending σ to be the separability degree of L/K.
§ At most [L:K] embeddings exist
- We will show for simple extensions K(α)/K that there are at most [K(α):K] ways to extend σ:K→K into σ′:K(α)→K.
- We use two facts: first, σ′ is entirely determined by where it sends α. Second, α can only go to another root of its minimal polynomial p∈K[x]. Thus, there are only finitely many choices, and the minimal polynomial has at most degree(p) unique roots, and [K(α):K]=degree(p). Thus, there are at most degree(pα)=[L:K] choices of where α can go to, which entirely determines σ′. Thus there are at most degree(p)=[K(α):K]choices for σ′.
- Given a larger extension, write a sequence of extensions L=K(α1)(α2)…(αn). Then, since [L:K]=[K(α):K][K(α1,α2):K(α1)]and so on, can repeatedly apply the same argument to bound the number of choices of σ′.
- In detail, for the case K(α)/K, consider the minimal polynomial of α, p(x)∈K[x]. Then p(α)=0.
- Since σ fixes K, and p has coefficients from K, we have that σ(p(x))=p(σ(x)).
- Thus, in particular, σ(0)=σ(p(α))=p(σ(α)).
- This implies that p(σ(α))=0, or σ(α) is a root of p.
- Since σ′:L→K, σ′ can only map α to one of the other roots of p.
- p has at most deg(p) unique roots [can have repeated roots, or some such, so could have fewer that that ].
- Further, σ′ is entirely determined by where it maps α. Thus, there are at most [K(α):K] ways to extend σ to σ′.
§ Separability is transitive
- Given a tower K⊆L⊆M⊆K, we fix an embedding κ:K→K. If both L/K and M/L are finite and separable, then κ extends into λ:L→K through L/K in [L:K] ways, and then again as μ:L→K in [M:L] ways.
- This together means that we have [L:K]⋅[M:L]=[M:K] ways to extend κ into μ, which is the maximum possible.
- Thus, M/K is separable.
§ Separable by polynomial implies separable by embeddings
- Let every α∈L have minimal polynomial that is separable (ie, has distinct roots).
- Then we must show that L/K allows us to extend any embedding σ:K→K in [L:K] ways into σ′:L→K
- Write L as a tower of extensions. Let K0≡K, and Ki+1≡Ki(αi) with Kn=L.
- At each step, since the polynomial is separable, we have the maximal number of choices of where we send σ′. Since degree is multiplicative, we have that [L:K]=[K1:K0][K2:K1]…[Kn−1:Kn.
- We build σ′ inductively as σi′:K→Ki with σ0′≡σ.
- Then at step i, σi+1′:K→K(i+1) which is σi+1′:K→Ki(αi+1) has [Ki+1:Ki] choices, since αi+1 is separable over Ki since its minimal polynomial is separable.
- This means that in toto, we have the correct [L:K] number of choices for σn:K→Kn=L, which is what it means to be separable by embeddings.
§ Separable by embeddings implies separable by polynomial
- Let L/K be separable in terms of embeddings. Consider some element α∈L, let its minimal polynomial be p(x).
- Write L=K(α)(β1,…,βn). Since degree is multiplicative, we have [L:K]=[K(α):K][K(α,βi):K(α)].
- So given an embedding σ:K→K,we must be able to extend it in [L:K] ways.
- Since σ must send α to a root of α, and we need the total to be [L:K], we must have that p(x) has no repeated roots.
- If p(x) had repeated roots, then we will have fewer choices of σ(α) thatn [K(α):K], which means the total count of choices for σ′ will be less than [L:K], thereby contradicting separability.
§ Finite extensions generated by separable elements are separable
- Let L=K(α1,…,αn) be separable, so there are [L:K] ways to extend a map κ:K→K into λ:L→L.
- Since we have shown that separable by polyomial implies separable by embedding, we write L=K(α1)(α2)…(αn). Each step is separable by the arguments given above in terms of counting automorphisms by where they send αi. Thus, the full L is separable.
§ References
- https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2227777/compositum-of-separable-extension
- https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1248781/primitive-element-theorem-without-galois-group