Finite Abelian grouos and their Charactera The Chapter starts with Postulates of a group.

Postulates of a Group

An Abelian Group is a commutative group.

a,bG:ab=ba\forall a,b \in G : ab=ba

Finite Groups : If G is a finite set. Subgroup : A non empty Subset of GG, GG', which itself is a group with the same group operator.

§ Thm 6.1:

If Elements a,b,cGa,b,c \in G satisfy:

ac=bc \lor ca=cb

then a=ba=b.

If GG' is a subgroup of GG, then for any element aGa \in G we call nNn \in \mathbb N to be an Indicator of aa if anGa^n \in G', and nn is the smallest positive integer [0][\neq 0].

§ Thm 6.6

Let GG' be a subgroup of a finite abelian group GG, where GGG \neq G'. Choose an element aG/Ga \in G / G' and let hh be it's indicator. Then the set of products:

G={xak:xGk=0,1,2,h1} G'' = \{ xa^k : x \in G' \land k = 0,1,2\dots,h-1 \}

is a subgroup of GG which contains GG'. Order of GG'' is hh times that of GG'.

§ Charaters of Finite abelian groups

§ Definition of Character:

Let GG be an arbitrary finite group. A complex valued function f:GC×f: G \rightarrow \mathbb C^\times defined on GG is called a character if ff is a group homomorphism. That is, it has the multiplicative property:

f(ab)=f(a)f(b) f(ab) = f(a)f(b)

§ Theorem 6.7

If f defined over FAG GG which has indentity ee, then f(e)=1f(e)=1 and each function value f(a) is a root of unity.

an=ef(a)n=1 a^n =e \quad f(a)^n=1

Hence, to be more accurate, we can write f:GU(1)f: G \rightarrow U(1) where U(1){cC:c=1}U(1) \equiv \{ c \in C : |c| = 1 \}

§ Theorem 6.8

A FAG of order nn has exactly nn distinct characters.

GG' is a proper subgroup of GG.. GG'' is constructed from GG' using

G1G2G3Gt+1=G G_1 \subsetneq G_2 \subsetneq G_3 \dots \subsetneq G_{t+1} = G

§ How do we extend?

If we have an element c=arhc =a_r^h cGrc \in G_r, f(c)=f(c)f'(c) = f(c)

f(ar)h=f(c)f'(a_r)^h = f(c) f(ar)h=1f(c)f'(a_r)^h = 1 \cdot f(c) f(ar)=e2πk/hf(c)1/hf'(a_r) = e^{2\pi k/h} \cdot f(c)^{1/h}

So now for the value of f(ar)f'(a_r) we have h choices. So we can extend f into h new f'.

TODO: show that this is a legit group hom. [I believe this ] f(xark.yarj)=f(xark)f(yarj)f'(xa_r^k.ya_r^j) = f'(xa_r^k)f'(ya_r^j) [Can be proved ]

§ The Charater Group

This section GG is a FAG of order n. The principle/principal character is called f1f_1, is the function f1(_)=1f_1(\_) = 1. The others, denoted by f2,f3,fnf_2,f_3, \dots f_n ar called non-principal charactes. They have the property that f(a)1f(a)\neq 1 for some aGa \in G.

§ Thm 6.9

If multiplication of characters is defined by the relation:

then set of characters forms an Abelian group of order nn. The group is dentoed by G^\hat G. The identity is f1f_1. The inverse is of fif_i is the reciprocal 1/fi1/f_i.

Note: For each ff we have f(a)=1|f(a)| = 1, since it is the character of a FAG.

f(a)=1f(a)=f(a1) \overline{f}(a) = \frac{1}{f(a)} = f(a^{-1})

Does there exist a morphism ϕ:GG^\phi: G \rightarrow \hat G?

§ Orthogonality relations for characters

GG = FAG of order n with elements a1,a2,...ana_1, a_2, ... a_n and let f1,f2,...,fnf_1, f_2,...,f_n be the characters of G, with f1f_1 being principal character.

aijfi(aj) a_{ij} \equiv f_{i}(a_{j})

§ Thm 6.10

The sum of entries in the iith row of AA is given by

r=1nfi(ar){nif fi is the principal character (i=1)0otherwise \sum_{r=1}^n f_{i}(a_r) \equiv \begin{cases} n & \text{if $f_i$ is the principal character ($i=1$)} \\ 0 & \text{otherwise} \end{cases}
S=r=1nfi(bar)=fi(b)r=1nfi(ar)=fi(b)S S =\sum_{r=1}^n f_{i}(ba_r) = f_i(b)\sum_{r=1}^n f_{i}(a_r) = f_i(b)S

§ Thm 6.11

Let AA^\star be the transpose conjugate of AA. Then we have

where II is n×nn\times n identity matrix. Hence n1An^{-1} A^\star is the Inverse of AA.

Let B=AAB = AA^\star The entry bijb_{ij} in the ith row and jth column of B is

bijr=1nfi(ar)fj(ar)=r=1n(fifj)(ar)=r=1nfk(ar) b_{ij} \equiv \sum_{r=1}^{n} f_i(a_r)\overline{f_j}(a_r) = \sum_{r=1}^n (f_i\overline{f_j})(a_r) = \sum_{r=1}^n f_k(a_r)

Where fk=fi(fj)=fi/fjf_k = f_i\overline{(f_j)} = f_i/f_j. Now fi/fj=f1f_i/f_j = f_1 if and only if i=ji=j, Hence by thm 6.10 we have:

bij=nδij b_{ij} = n \delta_{ij}

B=nIB = nI

§ Thm 6.12 --- Orhtogonatilty Relations for Characters

We have:

r=1nfr(ai)fr(aj)=nδai,aj \sum_{r=1}^{n} \overline{f_r}(a_i)f_r(a_j) = n \delta{a_i,a_j}

§ Proof:

AA=nIC=AA=nI. AA^\star = nI \\ C=A^{\star}A=nI. \\

Then the left side of the sum is cijc_{ij}. Now since fr(ai)=fr(ai)1=fr(ai1)\overline{f_r}(a_i) = f_r(a_i)^{-1} = f_r(a_i^{-1})

r=1nfr(ai1aj)=nδai,aj \sum_{r=1}^n f_r(a_i^{-1}a_j) = n\delta{a_i,a_j}

If ai=ea_i = e then we have

§ Thm 6.13:

The sum of entries of jth column of A is given by:

r=1nfr(aj)=nδaj,e\sum_{r=1}^n f_r(a_j) = n\delta{aj,e}

16/05/2020

§ Dirichlet Characters

From here GG is group of reduced residue classes modulo a fixed positive integer kk.

First we prove that GG is a group if a multiplication is suitably defined.

§ Reduced Residue system modulo kk

A set of φ(k)\varphi(k) integers {a1,a2,,aφ(k)}\{a_{1},a_{2},\dots,a_{\varphi(k)}\} incongruent modulo kk, each of which is relatively prime to kk.

For each integer aa the corresponding residue class a^\hat{a} is the set of all integers congruent to aa modulo kk:

a^={x:xamodk} \hat{a}=\{x:x\equiv a \mod k\}

We define multiplication of residue classes by the relation:

a^ .b^=ab^ \hat{a}\ . \hat{b} = \hat{ab}

§ Thm 6.14

With multiplication defined as above, the set of reduced residue classes modulo k is finite abelian group of order φ(k)\varphi(k). Isn't this group Z/kZ×\mathbb Z/k \mathbb Z^\times?

§ Definition of Dirichlet Characters:

Let GG be the group of reduced residue classes modulo k. ( G=Z/kZ×G = \mathbb Z/k\mathbb Z^\times) Coressponding to each character f of G, we define an arithmetic function χ=χf\chi = \chi_f as follows:

χf:N(?)Cχf(n)={f(n^)if (n,k)=10if (n,k)>1 χ11 if (n,k)=1 else 0 \begin{aligned} &\chi_f: \mathbb N (?) \rightarrow \mathbb C \\ &\chi_f(n) = \begin{cases} f(\hat{n}) & \text{if $(n,k)=1$} \\ 0 & \text{if $(n,k)>1$ } \end{cases} \\ &\chi_1 \equiv \text{$1$ if $(n, k) = 1$ else $0$} \end{aligned}

§ Thm 6.15

There are φ(k)\varphi(k) characters modulo k, each of which is completely multiplicative and periodic with period k. i.e.

χ(mn)=χ(m)χ(n)χ(n+k)=χ(n) \chi(mn)=\chi(m)\chi(n)\\ \chi(n+k) = \chi(n)
Commentary (bollu, crypt)k = 3n:     0, 1,        2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7chi n: 0, f(1),f(2),   0, f(1), f(2), 0this cannot  have period less than 3because f(_) is in nth roots of unity,cannot become 0.

Conversly, if χ\chi is completely multiplicative and preiodic with period kk and if χ(n)=0 if (n,k)>1\chi(n) = 0~\text{if}~ (n,k) >1 then χ\chi is one of the dirichlet character modulo k.

§ Proof Thm 6.15 (forward):

There are φ(k)\varphi(k) characters f of G, hence there are φ(k)\varphi(k) characters χf\chi_f modulo kk. The multiplicative property follows from f when both m,n are relatively prime to k. If one of them is not relatively prime, then neither is mnmn hence both values become 0. The periodicity property follows from the fact that χf(n)=f(n^)\chi_f(n) = f(\hat{n}) and that abmodka\equiv b \mod k implies gcd(a,k)=gcd(b,k)\gcd(a,k) = \gcd(b,k).

§ Thm 6.15: Proof of converse

To prove the converse, we note that the function f defined on the group G by the equation:

f(n^)=χ(n) if (n,k)=1 f(\hat{n}) = \chi(n)\ \text{if}~ (n,k)=1

is a character of G, so \chi is a dirichlet character mod k.

The image of χ\chi must be a root of unity because

χ(1×1)=χ(1)    χ(1)=1χ(a)φ(k)=χ(aφ(k))=χ(1modk)=χ(1)=1χ(a)φ(k)=1χ(a)=φ(k)th root of unity \begin{aligned} &\chi(1 \times 1) = \chi(1) \implies \chi(1) = 1 \\ &\chi(a)^{\varphi(k)} = \chi(a^{\varphi(k)}) = \chi(1 \mod k) = \chi(1) = 1 \\ &\chi(a)^{\varphi(k)} = 1 \\ &\chi(a) = \text{$\varphi(k)$th root of unity} \end{aligned}

§ Thm 6.16

Let χ1,χ2χφ(k)\chi_1, \chi_2 \dots \chi_{\varphi(k)} denote the φ(k)\varphi(k) dirichlet characters modulo k. Let m and n be two integers with gcd(n,k)=1\gcd(n,k)=1 Then we have:

r=1φ(k)χr(m)χr(n)={φ(k)if mnmodk0if m≢nmodk \sum_{r=1}^{\varphi(k)} \chi_{r}(m)\overline{\chi_r(n)} = \begin{cases} \varphi(k) & \text{if $m\equiv n \mod k$} \\ 0 & \text{if $m \not \equiv n \mod k$} \end{cases}

§ Proof:

m≢nmodkm \not \equiv n \mod k.

§ Sums Involving Dirichlet characters:

§ Thm 6.17

Let χ\chi be any non-principal character modulo k, let ff be a non-negative function which has a continuous negative derivative f(x)f'(x) for all xx0x \ge x_0. Then if yxx0y \ge x \ge x_0 we have:

x<nyχ(n)f(n)=O(f(x))(7) \sum_{x<n\le y} \chi(n)f(n) = O (f(x)) - (7)

If in addition f(x)0f(x) \rightarrow 0 as xx \rightarrow \infty then the infinte series

n=1χ(n)f(n) \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \chi(n)f(n)

converges and we have for xx0x\ge x_0,

nxχ(n)f(n)=n=1χ(n)f(n)+O(f(x))(8) \sum_{n\le x} \chi(n)f(n) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\chi(n)f(n) + O(f(x)) - (8)

Proof: Let A(x)=nxχ(n)A(x) = \sum_{n\le x} \chi(n). Since χ\chi is non principal we have

A(k)=n=1kχ(n)=0 A(k) = \sum_{n=1}^{k} \chi(n) = 0

Because sum of nth roots of unity is equal to 0 for n strictly greater than 1. χ\chi evaluates to nth roots of unity plus some extra zeroes over [1..k]

By periodicity it follows that A(nk) = 0 for n=2,3.... hence A(x)<φ(k)|A(x)| < \varphi(k) for all x. i.e A(x) = O(1).

Notice that we only need to care about the last unevaluated period. This period has to be of length less that ϕ(k)\phi(k). If it were equal to ϕ(k)\phi(k), the sum over this would be 00. Now in this last period, which we shift to [0leftover][0\dots \texttt{leftover}], we get:

A(n)=n=0leftoverχ(n)n=0leftoverχ(n)n=0leftover1φ(k) |A(n)| = \left| \sum_{n=0}^{\texttt{leftover}} \chi(n) \right| \leq \sum_{n=0}^{\texttt{leftover}} | \chi(n) |\leq \sum_{n=0}^{\texttt{leftover}} 1 \lneq \varphi(k)

Note that χ(n)1|\chi(n)| \leq 1 since χ(n)\chi(n) evaluates to either 0 or a φ(k)\varphi(k) th root of unity whose absolute value is 1.

§ Chapter 4 thm 4.2:

Abel's Identity : For any arithmetical function a(n)a(n) let

A(x)=nxa(n) A(x) = \sum_{n\le x} a(n)

where A(x)=0A(x) = 0 if x<1x<1. Assume ff has a continuous derivative on the interval [y,x][y,x] where 0<y<x0<y<x. Then we have:

y<nxa(n)f(n)=A(x)f(x)A(y)f(y)yxA(t)f(t)dt \sum_{y<n\le x} a(n)f(n) = A(x)f(x) - A(y)f(y) - \int_{y}^{x} A(t)f'(t) dt

§ Proof:

Let k=[x]k =[x] and m=[y]m=[y] so that A(x)=A(k)A(x)=A(k) and A(y)=A(m)A(y)=A(m). Then:

1.y<nxa(n)f(n)=n=m+1ka(n)f(n)=n=m+1k{A(n)A(n1)}f(n)2.=n=m+1kA(n)f(n)n=mk+1A(n)f(n+1)3.=n=m+1k1A(n){f(n)f(n+1)}+A(k)f(k)A(m)f(m+1)4.=[n=m+1k1A(n)(nn+1f(t)dt)]+A(k)f(k)A(m)f(m+1)5.=[n=m+1k1nn+1A(t)f(t)]+A(k)f(k)A(m)f(m+1)6.=m+1kA(t)f(t)+A(x)f(x)kxA(t)f(t)dtA(y)f(y)ym+1A(t)f(t)dt6.=A(x)f(x)A(y)f(y)yxA(t)f(t)dt \begin{aligned} &1. \sum_{y<n\le x}a(n)f(n) = \sum_{n=m+1}^{k} a(n)f(n) = \sum_{n=m+1}^{k} \{A(n)-A(n-1)\}f(n)\\ &2. = \sum_{n=m+1}^{k} A(n)f(n) - \sum_{n=m}^{k+1} A(n)f(n+1)\\ &3. = \sum_{n=m+1}^{k-1} A(n)\{f(n)-f(n+1)\} + A(k)f(k) -A(m)f(m+1)\\ &4. = - \left[ \sum_{n=m+1}^{k-1}A(n) \left ( \int_{n}^{n+1}f'(t)dt \right) \right] + A(k)f(k) - A(m)f(m+1)\\ &5. = - \left[\sum_{n=m+1}^{k-1}\int_{n}^{n+1} A(t)f'(t)\right] + A(k)f(k) -A(m)f(m+1) \\ &6. = -\int_{m+1}^{k} A(t)f'(t) + A(x)f(x) - \int_{k}^{x} A(t)f'(t)dt - A(y)f(y) - \int_{y}^{m+1} A(t)f'(t)dt\\ &6. = A(x)f(x) - A(y)f(y) - \int_{y}^{x}A(t)f'(t)dt \end{aligned}

§ Proof of (7)

x<nyχ(n)f(n)=f(y)χ(y)f(x)χ(x)xyA(t)f(t)dt=O(f(y))+O(f(x))+O(xyA(t)f(t)dt)=O(f(x)) \sum_{x<n\le y} \chi(n)f(n) = f(y)\chi(y) - f(x)\chi(x) - \int_{x}^{y} A(t)f'(t)dt \\ = O(f(y)) + O(f(x)) + O(\int_{x}^{y}A(t)f'(t)dt)\\ = O(f(x))

We note that

xyA(t)f(t)dtxyA(t)f(t)dt1f(t)dtxyf(t)dt=f(y)f(x) \int_x^y A(t) f'(t) dt \leq \int_x^y |A(t)| f'(t) dt \leq |1| \int f'(t) dt \leq \int_x^y f'(t) dt = f(y) - f(x)

by using the fact that (1) f(t)f'(t) does not change sign, (2) A(x)1|A(x)| \leq 1.

If f(x)0f(x) \rightarrow 0 as xx \rightarrow \infty then eqn 7 shows that the series

n=1χ(n)f(n) \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \chi(n)f(n)

converges because of cauchy convergence (TODO) criterion. Mayhaps the proof is:

limkn=1kχ(n)f(n)ϕ(k)f(n)ϵ>0,N,nN,ϕ(k)f(n+1)ϕ(k)f(n)<ϵ \lim_{k \rightarrow \infty} \sum_{n=1}^{k} \chi(n)f(n) \lneq \phi(k) f(n)\\ \forall \epsilon > 0, \exists N, \forall n \geq N, |\phi(k) f(n+1) - \phi(k)f(n)| < \epsilon \\

To prove eqn 8 we simply note that

n=1χ(n)f(n)=nxχ(n)f(n)+limyx<nyχ(n)f(n) \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\chi(n)f(n) = \sum_{n\le x}\chi(n)f(n) + \lim_{y\rightarrow \infty} \sum_{x<n\le y} \chi(n)f(n)

Because of eqn 7, the limit on the right if O(f(x)). This completes the proof.

Mow we apply thm 6.17 successively with f(x) = 1/x, f(x) = (log(x))/x and f(x) = 1/\sq THm 6.18