§ The problem definition

§ The hammer: Euler characteristic

§ Constructing the euler characteristic

§ Bootstrapping from 1D

in 1D, how many types of intervals do we have? 4:

We want to build a function χ: Intervals -> Z such that χ(interval) = #of vertices - #of edges. Specifically:

§ Indicator functions

Reals and the interval [a, b]:----[=====]----    a     bf corresponding to [a, b]:  |1 |   x=========x  |0 *===o---------o======>      a         b

§ Constructing χ:

§ δ[f]

Reals and the interval [a, b]:----[=====]----    a     bf corresponding to [a, b]:  |1 |   x=========x  |0 *===o---------o======>      a         bδ[f](x) = lim[ε → 0+] f(x) - f(x-ε)

§ χ of the closed-closed interval:

x < a:

    f(x-ε)=0    f(x)=0
  |   |          |
1 |   |          |    x=========x
  |   |          |
0 *===|==========|====o---------o======>< a:

    f(x-ε)=0    f(x)=0
  |   |          |
1 |   |          |    x=========x
  |   |          |
0 *===|==========|====o---------o======>      |          |    a         b< a:

    f(x-ε)=0    f(x)=0
  |   |          |
1 |   |          |    x=========x
  |   |          |
0 *===|==========|====o---------o======>     x-ε         x< a:

    f(x-ε)=0    f(x)=0
  |   |          |
1 |   |          |    x=========x
  |   |          |
0 *===|==========|====o---------o======>< a:

    f(x-ε)=0    f(x)=0
  |   |          |
1 |   |          |    x=========x
  |   |          |
0 *===|==========|====o---------o======>δ[f](x) = 0 when x < a
x = a:    f(a-ε)=0      |   f(a)=1  |   |    |1 |   |    x=========x  |   |0 *===|====o---------o======>      |         a         b     x-εδ[f](a) = lim[ε → 0+]  f(a) - f(a - ε) = 1 - 0 = 1
Case 3: a < x <= b [notice the <= !]

            f(x-ε) = 1
             |
             |  f(x) = 1
  |          |  |
1 |       x==|==|====x
  |
0 *=======o---------o======>< x <= b [notice the <= !]

            f(x-ε) = 1
             |
             |  f(x) = 1
  |          |  |
1 |       x==|==|====x
  |
0 *=======o---------o======>          a         b< x <= b [notice the <= !]

            f(x-ε) = 1
             |
             |  f(x) = 1
  |          |  |
1 |       x==|==|====x
  |
0 *=======o---------o======>< x <= b [notice the <= !]

            f(x-ε) = 1
             |
             |  f(x) = 1
  |          |  |
1 |       x==|==|====x
  |
0 *=======o---------o======>δ[f](x) = 1 - 1 = 0 when a < x <= b
Case 4: b < x


                        f(x-ε) = 0
1 |        x========x   |   f(x) = 0
  |                     |   |
0 *=======o---------o===|===|==>< x


                        f(x-ε) = 0
1 |        x========x   |   f(x) = 0
  |                     |   |
0 *=======o---------o===|===|==>          a         b< x


                        f(x-ε) = 0
1 |        x========x   |   f(x) = 0
  |                     |   |
0 *=======o---------o===|===|==>< x


                        f(x-ε) = 0
1 |        x========x   |   f(x) = 0
  |                     |   |
0 *=======o---------o===|===|==>δ[f](x) = 0 - 0 = 0 when b < x

The open-ness at b is vital for this to work. Because we are open at b, if you pick some x > b, then I can write x = b + α, where α > 0. I can then choose ε = α/2 to give me:

=  f(x) - f(x-ε)= f(b + α) - f(b + α - α/2)= f(b + α) - f(b + α/2)    [α/2 > 0 since α > 0]= 0 - 0 = 0

§ χ of closed-closed

§ χ of open-open

### ----(=====)----        a     bf2  |1 |             o==============o  |0 *=============x--------------x=========>                a              b- δ[f2](x <= a) = 0- δ[f2](a < x < b) = 0- δ[f2](x = b) = 0 - 1 = -1- δ[f2](b < x) = 0χ(f2) = 0 + 0 + -1 + 0 = -1

What happens at b?

                        f2(b-ε) = 1                         |                         |     f2(b) = 0                         |     |  |                      |     |1 |             o========|=====o  |                            |0 *=============x--------------x=========>δ[f2](x = b) = f2(b) - f2(b-ε) = 0 - 1 = -1

In words:

f(b) - lim[ε->0+] f(b-ε)[Let ε = L/2]~= f(b) - f(b-L/2)~= f(b) - f(a/2 + b/2) [the point a/2 + b/2 is in the middle of `(a, b)`]~= 0 [outside] - 1 [inside]~= -1

§ χ of open-closed: (a, b]:

f3:1 |             o=============x  |0 *=============x-------------o=========>- δ[f3](x <= a) = 0- δ[f3](a < x <= b) = 0- δ[f3](b < x) = 0χ(f3) = 0 + 0 + 0 = 0

§ χ of closed-open

f4:1 |             x=============o  |0 *=============o-------------x=========>- δ[f4](x < a) = 0- δ[f4](x = a) = 1 - 0 =  1- δ[f4](a < x < b) = 0- δ[f4](x = b) = 0 - 1 = -1- δ[f4](b < x) = 0χ(f4) = 0 + 1 + 0  -1 = 0

§ χ of unions

§ Review: what we have achieved so far

§ Upgrading χ to 2D:

TODO: add image from barvinok

§ Broke

δ[f](x) = lim[ε → 0+] f(x) - f(x-ε)χ(f) = sum up all the jumps as counted by δ across Rχ(f) = Σ_x δ[f](x)

§ Woke

χ0(∅)   = 0χ0(_) = 1δ1[I](x) = lim[ε → 0+] χ0(I∩{x}) - Χ0(I∩{x-ε})χ1(I) = Σ_x δ1[I](x)

§ Convex, concave and euler characteristic

§ Relationship to connected components:

§ References