technical note

§ Forcing to Add a Function

created 2022-09-07
  • Let MMM be a countable transitive model of ZFC.
  • We will add a new function c:ℵ0M→{0,1}Mc: \aleph_0^M \to \{0, 1\}^Mc:ℵ0M​→{0,1}M into MMM by creating M[G]M[G]M[G].
  • Let PPP be the set of all finite partial functions from ℵ0\aleph_0ℵ0​ to {0,1}\{0, 1\}{0,1} in MMM.
  • Let GGG be a generic maximal ideal of PPP. That is, GGG intersects every dense set of MMM.
  • Also, since it is a maximal ideal, taking the full union ∪G≡c\cup G \equiv c∪G≡c will give us a well defined total function.
  • It will be well defined since no two elements of GGG disagree, and it will be total because if it were not, we could extend GGG, contradicting the maximality of GGG.
  • Great, so if we can construct M[G]M[G]M[G], we will also have c=∪G∈M[G]c = \cup G \in M[G]c=∪G∈M[G].
  • But how do we know that ccc is new? Ie, how do we know that ci̸nMc \not in McinM?
  • Well, consider for any function h∈Mh \in Mh∈M, the subset of PPP that disagrees with hhh. That is, the subset Dh≡{p∈P:∃i,p(i)≠h(i)}D_h \equiv \{ p \in P : \exists i, p(i) \neq h(i) \}Dh​≡{p∈P:∃i,p(i)=h(i)}.
  • See that DhD_hDh​ is dense in MMM: Suppose p∈Pp \in Pp∈P, and ppp is well-defined on some subset SSS. Either ppp disagrees with hhh on SSS, that is, there is some s∈Ss \in Ss∈S such that p(s)≠h(s)p(s) \neq h(s)p(s)=h(s), in which case p∈Dhp \in D_hp∈Dh​ and we are done.
  • On the other hand, maybe h∣S=ph|S = ph∣S=p (that is, hhh restricted to SSS fully agrees with ppp). Then we pick some point s′i̸nSs' \not in Ss′inSand extend ppp into p′p'p′ to disagree with hhh at s′s's′. So define p′(s′)≡h(s′)+1p'(s') \equiv h(s') + 1p′(s′)≡h(s′)+1 or something. Now we have p≤p′p \leq p'p≤p′ and p′∈Dhp' \in D_hp′∈Dh​.
  • Since DhD_hDh​ is generic, we have that G∩Dh≠∅G \cap D_h \neq \emptysetG∩Dh​=∅, thus fff disagrees with hhh at some point!
  • Thinking intuitively, it would be a CRAZY coincidence for it to agree with a function hhh fully in MMM. If we build it "randomly", or "generically", one would expect it to disagree with stuff in MMM at some point in the construction!.
  • Cool, we've now seen how to enlarge the universe to add a single function of interest.
  • Reference
❦
Newer ৪ Blog ৪ Older