§ First over functions (fake category fluff)
Given a function and an embedding , then the Right Kan extension of along , denoted is a new function . So we are extending the domain of , along the extender . Informally, we write the new function as because:
C---| \-g---*j || |v vD--g/j--->Efoo(j(c)) = g(c)foo = (g/j)(c)g/j(j(c)) = g(c)§ Next over preorders (real category stuff)
The kan extension provides us a bijection, for
any function f: D -> E
C---| \-g---*j || |v vD--g/j--->ED------f->Ehom(f.j, g) ~= hom(f, g/j)That is, if we have some way to make congruent f.j with g, then we can
"split" the congruence to have f.j congruent with (g/j).j. Cancelling j,
we can have f congruent with g/j.
Consider a preorder with a ordering ≤. Equip with a monoidal structure <>,
which is a monotone map with a neutral element. (For example, integers with
multiplication and ≤).
The bijection of hom-sets is equivalent to saying
m*k <= n iff m <= n/k(how? I have no idea; I gotta work this out!)
§ Question: What happens in the context of vector spaces?
Since linear algebra is probably the nicest thing we have in math, I really want to understand what happens in the linear algebra case. I don't really understand how to make the correct version of a kan extension inside , though. A kan extension seems to fundamentally be a 2 categorical construct, than a 1 categorical construct.