§ Statement
if are two irreducible representations of the group , and is an equivariant map (that is, ), then we have that either or is an isomorphism.
- Said differently, this implies that either and are equivalent, and witnesses this isomorphism, or and are not isomorphic and is the zero map.
§ Proof
- First, note that and are invariant subspaces of .
- Let . hence:
So if then so does for all . Hence, the kernel is an invariant subspace.
- Next, let , such that hence:
So if then for all . Hence, image is an invariant subspace.
- Since is irreducible, we must have that either or . If this were not the case, then we could write non-trivially. This contradicts the irreducible nature of . Thus, either sends all of to (ie, is the zero map), or has trivial kernel (ie, is injective).
- Since is irreducible, we must have that either or by the exact same argument; is an invariant subspace, and is irreducible thus has non non-trivial invariant subspaces. Thus either ( is the zero map), or ( is surjective).
- Thus, either is the zero map, or is both injective and surjective; that is, it is bijective.
- The real star of the show is that (1) we choose irreducible representations, and (2) kernel and image are invariant subspaces for the chosen representations, thus we are forced to get trivial/full kernel/image.
§ Strengthing the theorem: what is ?
We can additionally show that if is not the zero map, then is constant times the identity. That is, there exists a such that .
- cannot have two eigenvalues. If it did, the eigenspaces of and would be different subspaces that are stabilized by . This can't happen because is irreducible. So, has a single eigenvalue .
- Thus, if has full spectrum, it's going to be .
- has full spectrum since we tacitly assume the underlying field is and has full rank.