This is trivial, I'm surprised it took me this long to internalize this fact.

When we convert a poset (X,≤)(X, \leq) into a category, we stipulate that x→y  ⟺  x≤yx \rightarrow y \iff x \leq y.

If we now consider the category SetSet of sets and functions between sets, and arrow A→fBA \xrightarrow{f} B is a function from AA to BB. If ff is monic, then we know that ∣A∣=∣Im(f)∣≤∣B∣|A| = |Im(f)| \leq |B|. That is, a monic arrow behaves a lot like a poset arrow!

Similarly, an epic arrow behaves a lot like the arrow in the inverse poset. I wonder if quite a lot of category theoretic diagrams are clarified by thinking of monic and epic directly in terms of controlling sizes.